Adjusting the concept of Islamic jurisprudential difference and its impact on the advancement of Islamic societies

Abstract

This study highlights one of the problems posed in Islamic societies, which is the issue of difference between members of society, and some of them link it to the difference of jurists whose purposes and concepts, types, and causes were not controlled, which led to conflict and dissension among many individuals and groups, and this does not pave the way  to develop and ameliorate Islamic societies. This study aims to control the concept of jurisprudential (Fiqh) difference, its purposes, what is acceptable and what is not accepted, its types, and some of its causes among scholars, and gives an example of that; In order to reduce the difference, the orientation towards work, cooperation, interdependence and compassion between individuals and groups; to join the nations.

The planning of the research: The first topic: the concept of jurisprudential difference and the evidence for its permissibility. It contains two demands: the first: the concept of disagreement and conflict, and second: the rule of jurisprudential difference and the evidence for its permissibility.

The second topic: types of jurisprudential (Fiqh) difference and some of its causes with representation, and there are two demands: The first: types of disagreement Fiqh and methods of its study, and the second: some reasons for the jurisprudential difference and its example. A conclusion: it includes the summary, results, and recommendations